1763 rfsa
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Requirements) |
(→Requirements) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Requirements == | == Requirements == | ||
| - | This request is to add both | + | This request is to add Extra Fields to the client applications reports as both filters & output for client companies who have "Extra field(s)" set in their Admin >> Client Company's profile under section E. Commodity Table Management. |
| + | |||
| + | '''Reports:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Client_In_Transit_Report_(component)]] | ||
| + | * [[Client_Main_Report]] | ||
| + | * [[Client_Where_Is_Report]] | ||
| - | |||
* Filter should display the '''name''' of the Extra Field as set in the client company. | * Filter should display the '''name''' of the Extra Field as set in the client company. | ||
Revision as of 21:43, 17 January 2011
Info
- mantis: 1763
Requirements
This request is to add Extra Fields to the client applications reports as both filters & output for client companies who have "Extra field(s)" set in their Admin >> Client Company's profile under section E. Commodity Table Management.
Reports:
- Filter should display the name of the Extra Field as set in the client company.
See Elizabeth Arden example below:
- Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company.
- Note, Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. It is also listed on their Daily_Report_-_Elizabeth_Arden where the names already displays under the column header of Division & Lot.
