1763 rfsa
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Requirements) |
(→Requirements) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* [[Client_Where_Is_Report]] | * [[Client_Where_Is_Report]] | ||
- | * Filter | + | * Add Filter option and display the '''name''' of the Extra Fields that are set in the client company. |
'''See Elizabeth Arden example below:''' | '''See Elizabeth Arden example below:''' | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | [[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | ||
- | * Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company. | + | * Output: |
- | ** | + | ** Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company. |
+ | ***Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. It is also listed on their [[Daily_Report_-_Elizabeth_Arden]] where the names already displays under the column header of ''Division'' & ''Lot''. | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 21:45, 17 January 2011
Info
- mantis: 1763
Requirements
This request is to add Extra Fields to the client applications reports as both filters & output for client companies who have "Extra field(s)" set in their Admin >> Client Company's profile under section E. Commodity Table Management.
Reports:
- Add Filter option and display the name of the Extra Fields that are set in the client company.
See Elizabeth Arden example below:
- Output:
- Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company.
- Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. It is also listed on their Daily_Report_-_Elizabeth_Arden where the names already displays under the column header of Division & Lot.
- Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company.