Acc reporting for groupped shipments
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→SOW 1) |
(→Comparison of screen shots) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
====Comparison of screen shots==== | ====Comparison of screen shots==== | ||
| - | Screen shot of profit/loss for CT results | + | Screen shot of Report: profit/loss for CT results |
[[File:Profit-loss for ct screen shot.JPG]] | [[File:Profit-loss for ct screen shot.JPG]] | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[File:Screen shot of P-l tab from the same CT records.JPG]] | [[File:Screen shot of P-l tab from the same CT records.JPG]] | ||
| - | The above results should be the results of this report. | + | The above results should be the results of this report. |
| - | + | ||
=== P/L for mult CTs Rep === | === P/L for mult CTs Rep === | ||
Revision as of 23:18, 7 December 2011
Contents |
Info
0003227: (Acc Etc) Cost allocation redesign (cost assignment to CT that is a part of a group, etc)
Requirements
Problem definition
- By design there is no concept of P/L(Gross Margin) amount for individual CT. This is only true in case CT is a part of a group. Assumption was that in this case it would be enough to define P/L amount for a group (that this CT belongs to). OD
SOW 1
Currently, in the case of group shipments, accounting reports are inconsistent. In some of these reports, the total profit and loss being reflected on the reports are not the profit and loss of the group, but the profit and loss for the individual CT record. In cases of group shipments, profit and loss should always report on the group P/L not the individual CT.
Profit/loss for CT
Go to Acc > Reports > Profit/Loss for CT and enter in the CT number.
- results displayed should match the P/L tab of that same CT number. Currently, if the CT number is part of a group these two totals do not match.
Comparison of screen shots
Screen shot of Report: profit/loss for CT results
Screen shot of the P/L tab for the same CT record.
The above results should be the results of this report.
P/L for mult CTs Rep
dfbdb
dgb
