2157 dev
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Business Analysis) |
|||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Example: | Example: | ||
- | |||
[[File:Cts with a loss revised.JPG]] | [[File:Cts with a loss revised.JPG]] | ||
- | |||
== Systems Analysis == | == Systems Analysis == | ||
+ | No additional SA info required. | ||
+ | |||
== Architect Review == | == Architect Review == | ||
+ | Not required | ||
+ | |||
== Implementation Summary == | == Implementation Summary == | ||
== QA Plan == | == QA Plan == | ||
== History == | == History == |
Current revision as of 03:46, 16 December 2010
Contents |
[edit] Info
- Mantis: 0002157: (Reps) (CTs With No Inv) Add 2 report types: “CT with Unbilled Sales”, “CT with a Loss”
- Support Guide: CTs With No Invoices
This is a change.
[edit] Business Analysis
[edit] Business Need
We need to create additional reports that would allow accounting to monitor that shipments are being invoiced in a timely manner and have a profitable gross margin.
[edit] Business Solution
Adding two additional report types:
[edit] CTs with Unbilled Sales
CT should appear on this report if:
CT record has no sales invoice issued. AND There is one or more Purchase invoice posted against this CT.
Notes: The system should not recognize internal invoices as a sales invoice for this report.
For group shipments, the system should recognize the CT records group that are included in the sales invoice.
Output:
Header:
- Report Type
- Date Range from
- Date Range to
Columns:
- CT Number
- Client Company
- Jaguar Office that has posted largest Purchase invoice against this CT.
The report should be downloadable to excel.
Example:
[edit] CT with a Loss
CT should appear on this report if:
The total purchase number is equal to or greater then the total sales number for this CT.
Output:
Header:
- Report Type
- Date Range from
- Date Range to
Columns:
- CT Number
- Client Company
- Jaguar Office that has posted largest Purchase invoice against this CT
- Total Gross Margin
The report should be downloadable to excel
[edit] Systems Analysis
No additional SA info required.
[edit] Architect Review
Not required