SA re defined

From UG

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Air Status EDI)
(CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal))
Line 58: Line 58:
=== CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal) ===
=== CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal) ===
* wiki: [[CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal)]]
* wiki: [[CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal)]]
 +
* Module Owner (MO): Simon
* Authors: Tracie (BA) and Alex (SA)
* Authors: Tracie (BA) and Alex (SA)
 +
* score: TBD
 +
* comments:
 +
 +
=== Visibility Redesign ===
 +
* wiki: [[Visibility Redesign]]
 +
* Module Owner (MO): Simon and Marc
 +
* Authors: Alex (BA) and Alex (SA)
* score: TBD
* score: TBD
* comments:
* comments:

Revision as of 20:57, 20 November 2010


Contents

To

Systems Analysts

Summary

Dev Team expressed concerns to me about what SAs put into wiki spec. To address them we agreed to the following.

Agreements

  • Main role of SA
It is in most cases to:
  • receive and review Business Requirements from BA,
  • point out on missing elements
  • help them finalize Business Requirements
  • No ZUL
No zul code should be created by SA. Reasons:
a) time consuming;
b) UIs should be created by developers
  • No mock-up
Same reasons as above
  • UI/functionality prototype
a) Due to changes above UI and functionality can be presented for review AFTER it was coded on Demo server. This is replacing a mechanism of creating/presenting UI mock ups.
b) in some cases UI mock ups will be used. Examples: in Design Ideas section; in pdf based proposals to Clients
  • SA Notes
Section "Detailed Design will be replaced" with "SA Notes"
  • Related specs must be linked
  • Keep it simple
  • First things first
Explain most important things first... then stop. If you have more time say more.
  • Exemplary specs
Create a list of specs that comply to the new standard. See #Exemplary specs

Exemplary specs

Non Shipment billing component

  • wiki: Non Shipment billing component
  • Authors: Tracie (BA) and Alex (SA)
  • score: A+
  • comments:
    • Kostya: Carefully read this spec. I like it very much: it is short, clear and has everything that is required.(Vnimatel'no prochital spec. Lichno mne ochen' ponravilos' - kratko, ponyatno i vsyo chto nuzno est'. )

Air Status EDI

  • wiki: Air Status EDI
  • Authors: Tracie (BA) and Alex (SA)
  • score: TBD
  • comments:
    • Alex: SA Notes section possibly too detailed. When do we pass this task to developer? What is the role of SA? Should he discuss XML design specifics with Descartes here or it is a developers job?

CT Records Per Client Company (Web Portal)

Visibility Redesign

  • wiki: Visibility Redesign
  • Module Owner (MO): Simon and Marc
  • Authors: Alex (BA) and Alex (SA)
  • score: TBD
  • comments:
Personal tools