2738 rfd

From UG

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Current NY based Linux servers and applications)
(Current NY based Linux servers and applications)
Line 42: Line 42:
2) '''Sugar CRM / EA Demo server'''  
2) '''Sugar CRM / EA Demo server'''  
* (old) Sugar CRM app - This has been migrated to *.74 CT2 server in a cloud  
* (old) Sugar CRM app - This has been migrated to *.74 CT2 server in a cloud  
-
** could be removed
+
** could be discontinued now
* EA Demo Apps - instances of internal and Client CT2 Apps for Sales
* EA Demo Apps - instances of internal and Client CT2 Apps for Sales
** has to be migrated  
** has to be migrated  
Line 50: Line 50:
3) '''Dev'''  
3) '''Dev'''  
* "Demo/QA" dev environment for QA and UAT (CT2 internal and client apps)
* "Demo/QA" dev environment for QA and UAT (CT2 internal and client apps)
 +
** in active use
* "Staging" dev environment for pere-release QA (CT2 internal and client apps)
* "Staging" dev environment for pere-release QA (CT2 internal and client apps)
 +
** in active use
Box: new Optiplex 330
Box: new Optiplex 330
-
4)
+
4) '''Dev Firewall'''
 +
* firewall for '''Dev''' server
 +
 
 +
Box: old PC
 +
 
 +
5) '''Mantis'''
 +
* Mantis App (old version)
 +
** not used, to be discontinued now
 +
* Wiki App (old version)
 +
** not used, to be discontinued now
 +
 
 +
Box: new Precision 390
 +
 
 +
6) '''Ext'''
 +
* backups for Dev server apps (anything else?)
 +
** used, not clear what exactly is there
 +
 
 +
Box: new Optiplex 330
=== Future solution ===
=== Future solution ===

Revision as of 20:09, 15 February 2011


Contents

Info

0002738: (Servers and Apps) Discontinue all Linux servers in Valley S and migrate applications

Requirements and Solutions

Intro

Number of factors related to the elimination or scaling down server farm:

  • President's strategic direction of "moving all NY servers into cloud" due to:
    • possibility of flood
    • lack of IT resources in house to support servers
  • TBD

Disadvantages of elimination of servers:

  • hire cost of hosting (if we need extra servers at hosting provider)

Potential compromise would be to leave one server in NY with some services/applications that:

  • could be easily recovered on non NY server in case of flood or lack of support
  • require no support from NY staff

Another option would be to have one Linux server that would run applications related to both CT2 development / production and to NY office internal IT needs (Squid, what else?)

Current NY based Linux servers and applications

These servers are part of NY office network. All of them run some kind of Linux.

See Jaguar Network diagram below:

File:Network diagramm.JPG

Linux servers in NY office and list of apps/services running on them (as far as we know):

1) Squid proxy - this is the only server that is required for NY office network

  • Squid app
    • could be discontinued in the future
  • Door card DB
    • could be migrated into simple xls (for Michael to manage)

Box: old PC

2) Sugar CRM / EA Demo server

  • (old) Sugar CRM app - This has been migrated to *.74 CT2 server in a cloud
    • could be discontinued now
  • EA Demo Apps - instances of internal and Client CT2 Apps for Sales
    • has to be migrated

Box: new Optiplex 330

3) Dev

  • "Demo/QA" dev environment for QA and UAT (CT2 internal and client apps)
    • in active use
  • "Staging" dev environment for pere-release QA (CT2 internal and client apps)
    • in active use

Box: new Optiplex 330

4) Dev Firewall

  • firewall for Dev server

Box: old PC

5) Mantis

  • Mantis App (old version)
    • not used, to be discontinued now
  • Wiki App (old version)
    • not used, to be discontinued now

Box: new Precision 390

6) Ext

  • backups for Dev server apps (anything else?)
    • used, not clear what exactly is there

Box: new Optiplex 330

Future solution

Servers and applications will be located / distributed as follows:

TBD

Architect Review

Implementation Notes

QA Plan

History

Personal tools