2738 rfd

From UG

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'Category:RFD == Info == 0002738: (Servers and Apps) Discontinue all Linux servers in Valley S and migrate applications == Requirements == Number of factors related to the eā€¦')
Line 4: Line 4:
0002738: (Servers and Apps) Discontinue all Linux servers in Valley S and migrate applications
0002738: (Servers and Apps) Discontinue all Linux servers in Valley S and migrate applications
-
== Requirements ==
+
== Requirements and Solutions ==
 +
 
 +
=== Intro ===
Number of factors related to the elimination or scaling down server farm:
Number of factors related to the elimination or scaling down server farm:
* President's strategic direction of "moving all NY servers into cloud" due to:
* President's strategic direction of "moving all NY servers into cloud" due to:
Line 18: Line 20:
* require no support from NY staff
* require no support from NY staff
-
== Solutions ==
+
Another option would be to have one Linux server that would run applications related to both CT2 development / production and to NY office internal IT needs (Squid, what else?)
 +
 
 +
=== Current servers and applications ===
 +
 
 +
These servers are part of NY office network. All of them run some kind of Linux.
 +
 
 +
See NY office Network diagram below:
 +
 
 +
[[File:Network diagramm.JPG]]
 +
 
 +
Linux servers in NY office:
 +
 
 +
*
 +
 
 +
List of apps/services running on Linux servers (as far as we know):
 +
 
 +
== Architect Review ==
== Architect Review ==

Revision as of 21:54, 13 February 2011


Contents

Info

0002738: (Servers and Apps) Discontinue all Linux servers in Valley S and migrate applications

Requirements and Solutions

Intro

Number of factors related to the elimination or scaling down server farm:

  • President's strategic direction of "moving all NY servers into cloud" due to:
    • possibility of flood
    • lack of IT resources in house to support servers
  • TBD

Disadvantages of elimination of servers:

  • hire cost of hosting

Potential compromise would be to leave one server with some services/applications that:

  • could be easily recovered on non NY server in case of flood or lack of support
  • require no support from NY staff

Another option would be to have one Linux server that would run applications related to both CT2 development / production and to NY office internal IT needs (Squid, what else?)

Current servers and applications

These servers are part of NY office network. All of them run some kind of Linux.

See NY office Network diagram below:

File:Network diagramm.JPG

Linux servers in NY office:

List of apps/services running on Linux servers (as far as we know):

Architect Review

Implementation Notes

QA Plan

History

Personal tools