1763 rfsa
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Requirements) |
(→Requirements) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
** IE - Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. Extra field 1 is "named" ''Division'' & Extra field 2 is "named" ''Lot''. So when an Elizabeth Arden client user goes into Where Is client company is set to Elizabeth Arden, the filter Extra Field would display and then when they select it, both Division & Lot would be an option for them to select. | ** IE - Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. Extra field 1 is "named" ''Division'' & Extra field 2 is "named" ''Lot''. So when an Elizabeth Arden client user goes into Where Is client company is set to Elizabeth Arden, the filter Extra Field would display and then when they select it, both Division & Lot would be an option for them to select. | ||
| - | See below for example: | + | '''See below for example:''' |
[[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | [[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 17 January 2011
Info
- mantis: 1763
Requirements
This request is to add both a filtering option for clients who have "Extra field(s)" set in their Admin >> Client Company's profile under section E. Commodity Table Management as well as an output option.
- Add Extra Fields to the client applications where is report & main report as both filter & output.
- Allow client user to select the name of the Extra Field.
- IE - Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. Extra field 1 is "named" Division & Extra field 2 is "named" Lot. So when an Elizabeth Arden client user goes into Where Is client company is set to Elizabeth Arden, the filter Extra Field would display and then when they select it, both Division & Lot would be an option for them to select.
See below for example:
