Ocean Docs Commodity Table (feature)
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Use case: CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods) |
(→Technical Specification) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
- | ==== Use case: CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods ==== | + | ==== Use case A: CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods ==== |
Example: see Figure 1,2,3. | Example: see Figure 1,2,3. | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* only one CT | * only one CT | ||
* CT does not belong to any Master | * CT does not belong to any Master | ||
- | + | * CT does not belong to any Group | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | ==== Use case B: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap ==== | ||
Example: see Figure 4,5,6. | Example: see Figure 4,5,6. | ||
- | ==== Use case: 2 CTs Grouped In a Master No Container overlap ==== | + | This case is built upon previous. We grouped CT from Case A with additional CT that has one container. |
+ | |||
+ | But still no Master. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Use case C: 2 CTs Grouped In a Master No Container overlap ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let's add group in case B to empty Master. | ||
In this case (Master exists) system should give same result as in [[#Use case: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap]] | In this case (Master exists) system should give same result as in [[#Use case: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap]] | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 18 January 2010
Parent Mantis
Business Needs and Requirements
Technical Specification
Summary
This is a sub class for all Docs Commodity Tables, MOT = FCL.
Assumptions
- User will not generate pdf with unassigned commodities.
User Interface and Functionality
Use case A: CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods
Example: see Figure 1,2,3.
This is the simplest case:
- only one CT
- CT does not belong to any Master
- CT does not belong to any Group
Use case B: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap
Example: see Figure 4,5,6.
This case is built upon previous. We grouped CT from Case A with additional CT that has one container.
But still no Master.
Use case C: 2 CTs Grouped In a Master No Container overlap
Let's add group in case B to empty Master.
In this case (Master exists) system should give same result as in #Use case: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap
Misc
Look And Feel
Figures
Figure 1: FCL Commod Table CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods (Cont Tab)
Figure 2: FCL Commod Table CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods (Template)
Figure 3: FCL Commod Table CT No Group No Master 2 ctnrs 3 commods (Pdf)
Figure 4: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap (Cont Tab CT2)
Figure 5: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap (Template)
Figure 6: 2 CTs Grouped No Master No Container overlap (Pdf)
RFC
Known Non Critical Bugs and Issues
- does it matter where / how CT# is displayed - before or after descr, etc?