DQ and RFC process
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→RFC Phases) |
(→DQ) |
||
(34 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* DQ = Development Queue | * DQ = Development Queue | ||
- | == | + | == Top level Jag Soft Dev Workflow classes == |
- | + | We have the following top level workflows | |
- | + | * Projects (Prj). Examples: GM Split, POEM, DR/KPI, I-Portal | |
+ | * Urgent Bugs (UB) | ||
+ | * Urgent Change (UC) | ||
+ | * Development Queue (DQ) - any work that is subject to CT2 Release and is not covered by '''Prj''' or '''UB''' | ||
+ | * Support (Sup). Examples: create new user, re-start server, etc. | ||
+ | * Misc (Misc) | ||
- | + | "wf" mantis field is used to associate task with specific workflow class. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | * Prj | |
+ | * UB | ||
+ | * UC | ||
+ | * DQ1 - Invention/Analysis phases of DQ (BA/SA/etc) | ||
+ | * DQ2 - Implementation phases of DQ (Dev/QA/SIT/etc) | ||
+ | * Sup | ||
+ | * Misc | ||
- | == | + | == IP == |
- | + | Prj, UB, DQ have different initial phases but common end: IP (Implementation Phase). | |
- | * ''' | + | It consists of the following sub-phases: |
+ | |||
+ | * Dev | ||
+ | * QA | ||
+ | * SIT | ||
+ | * UAT | ||
+ | * Stg (Staging) | ||
+ | * Rel (Release) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == UB == | ||
+ | Phases: | ||
+ | * BR - bug report | ||
+ | * [[#IP]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == UC == | ||
+ | Phases: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * BA | ||
+ | * SA | ||
+ | * Est | ||
+ | * [[#IP]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Proj == | ||
+ | Phases: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * BA | ||
+ | * SA | ||
+ | * Est | ||
+ | * [[#IP]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == DQ == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Phases: | ||
+ | |||
+ | DQ1: | ||
+ | * RFC | ||
+ | * IBA | ||
+ | * ISA | ||
+ | * PTR | ||
+ | * FSA | ||
+ | * Est | ||
+ | |||
+ | DQ2 | ||
+ | * [[#IP]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Details of DQ workflow == | ||
+ | |||
+ | For convenience it is broken into 2 sub-workflows: DQ1 and DQ2. | ||
+ | |||
+ | DQ1: | ||
+ | * covers BA, SA and related | ||
+ | * '''wf mantis field''' = DQ1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | DQ2: | ||
+ | * covers Implementation (Dev/QA/SIT/etc) | ||
+ | * '''wf mantis field''' = DQ2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | === DQ1 details === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== RFC ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''purpose''': create mantis | ||
* '''owner''': Denise | * '''owner''': Denise | ||
+ | * '''ph mantis field''': RFC | ||
Details: | Details: | ||
- | * create mantis for | + | * create mantis record with initial available info for Change Request or Non Urgent Bug |
- | + | ||
- | === | + | ==== IBA ==== |
+ | |||
+ | * '''purpose:''' (Initial Biziness Analysis or Bug Report) | ||
+ | * '''owner''': Denise | ||
+ | * '''ph mantis field''': IBA | ||
+ | |||
+ | Details: | ||
+ | * Conduct and post into mantis preliminary Business Analysis/Requirements (for changes) or Detailed Bug Report (for bugs) | ||
+ | * design/solution ideas could be added as well if needed/available | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== ISA ==== | ||
* '''purpose:''' (Initial Sys Analysis) | * '''purpose:''' (Initial Sys Analysis) | ||
- | * owner: Alex | + | * '''owner''': Alex |
+ | * '''ph mantis field''': ISA | ||
Details: | Details: | ||
Line 61: | Line 143: | ||
* set L0 emh/emhR | * set L0 emh/emhR | ||
- | === | + | ==== PTR ==== |
- | * | + | * '''purpose''': (Product Team Review) |
- | * owner: ? | + | * '''owner''': Denise or Alex? |
+ | * '''ph mantis field''': PTR | ||
- | + | Details: | |
* review periodically tasks that completed RFC-SA (say 5 a week) | * review periodically tasks that completed RFC-SA (say 5 a week) | ||
Line 74: | Line 157: | ||
* post notes as required | * post notes as required | ||
- | === | + | === FSA === |
- | + | * '''purpose''': Full System Analysis | |
+ | * '''owner''': AG | ||
+ | * '''ph mantis field:''' FSA | ||
+ | |||
+ | Details: | ||
* conduct L1 SA | * conduct L1 SA | ||
Line 82: | Line 169: | ||
* create SOW | * create SOW | ||
- | === | + | === Est === |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * '''purpose''': Exact estimation | ||
+ | * '''owner''': Developer/ Dev Manager | ||
+ | * '''ph mantis field:''' Est | ||
+ | |||
+ | Details: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * conduct L1 estimation (replace L0 with L1) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === DQ2 details === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * '''purpose''': Implementation | ||
+ | * '''owner''': Perry | ||
+ | * '''ph mantis field''': Dev/QA/SIT/UAT/T2S/Rel | ||
+ | |||
+ | Details: | ||
- | + | * conduct weekly DQ meetings to: | |
+ | ** a) review previous week's progress | ||
+ | ** b) create plans for next week | ||
- | |||
* review previous week's progress (post mortem): | * review previous week's progress (post mortem): | ||
** sort by due=wYY | ** sort by due=wYY | ||
** go task by task and see status/ph it is in (most must pass QA and be in SIT/UAT) | ** go task by task and see status/ph it is in (most must pass QA and be in SIT/UAT) | ||
- | ** send weekly review (post mortem) to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den) | + | ** send weekly review (post mortem) to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den). Highlight in RED overdue tasks/developers that have overdue tasks. |
* create plans for next week: | * create plans for next week: | ||
- | ** identify how many | + | ** identify how many m/h available from each dev next week (Normally, each dev would contribute 8 hours a week to DQ2. 4 hours if super busy with the Proj ) |
** sort tasks in DQ by T and create plan for each dev: | ** sort tasks in DQ by T and create plan for each dev: | ||
*** assign mantis to dev | *** assign mantis to dev | ||
Line 99: | Line 204: | ||
** send weekly plan to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den) | ** send weekly plan to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den) | ||
- | * coordinate SIT/UAT and | + | * coordinate SIT/UAT and Release phases of DQ2 |
Current revision as of 20:30, 27 June 2012
Contents |
[edit] Info
This wiki is about RFC and DQ methodology.
Problems with old process:
- no specs/SA in many cases
- developers had no clear plans
- we had no idea what will be completed when (except urgent tasks)
[edit] Glossary
- L0 (L zero) = initial/rough;
- L1 = full
- RFC = Request For Change
- DQ = Development Queue
[edit] Top level Jag Soft Dev Workflow classes
We have the following top level workflows
- Projects (Prj). Examples: GM Split, POEM, DR/KPI, I-Portal
- Urgent Bugs (UB)
- Urgent Change (UC)
- Development Queue (DQ) - any work that is subject to CT2 Release and is not covered by Prj or UB
- Support (Sup). Examples: create new user, re-start server, etc.
- Misc (Misc)
"wf" mantis field is used to associate task with specific workflow class.
- Prj
- UB
- UC
- DQ1 - Invention/Analysis phases of DQ (BA/SA/etc)
- DQ2 - Implementation phases of DQ (Dev/QA/SIT/etc)
- Sup
- Misc
[edit] IP
Prj, UB, DQ have different initial phases but common end: IP (Implementation Phase).
It consists of the following sub-phases:
- Dev
- QA
- SIT
- UAT
- Stg (Staging)
- Rel (Release)
[edit] UB
Phases:
- BR - bug report
- #IP
[edit] UC
Phases:
- BA
- SA
- Est
- #IP
[edit] Proj
Phases:
- BA
- SA
- Est
- #IP
[edit] DQ
Phases:
DQ1:
- RFC
- IBA
- ISA
- PTR
- FSA
- Est
DQ2
[edit] Details of DQ workflow
For convenience it is broken into 2 sub-workflows: DQ1 and DQ2.
DQ1:
- covers BA, SA and related
- wf mantis field = DQ1
DQ2:
- covers Implementation (Dev/QA/SIT/etc)
- wf mantis field = DQ2
[edit] DQ1 details
[edit] RFC
- purpose: create mantis
- owner: Denise
- ph mantis field: RFC
Details:
- create mantis record with initial available info for Change Request or Non Urgent Bug
[edit] IBA
- purpose: (Initial Biziness Analysis or Bug Report)
- owner: Denise
- ph mantis field: IBA
Details:
- Conduct and post into mantis preliminary Business Analysis/Requirements (for changes) or Detailed Bug Report (for bugs)
- design/solution ideas could be added as well if needed/available
[edit] ISA
- purpose: (Initial Sys Analysis)
- owner: Alex
- ph mantis field: ISA
Details:
- review periodically RFC records (say 5 a week)
- meet to discuss: Alex, AG, Sasha, Denise, etc (all together or in sub groups) (group might depend on the task)
- split / combine as required
- tweak summary/desc as required
- Mantis Description field should have 3 sections:
- Problem/Request
- Solution
- SOW link
- identify what is large enough to be classified as a project and tag as such
- discuss solution
- conduct and post into Mantis L0 SA
- set Dv (to "any" if possible or to specific dev)
- set L0 emh/emhR
[edit] PTR
- purpose: (Product Team Review)
- owner: Denise or Alex?
- ph mantis field: PTR
Details:
- review periodically tasks that completed RFC-SA (say 5 a week)
- meet to discuss requirements/solution/emh (Marc, Denise, Alex, Perry?)
- reject/approve (by Marc)
- set T
- post notes as required
[edit] FSA
- purpose: Full System Analysis
- owner: AG
- ph mantis field: FSA
Details:
- conduct L1 SA
- consult KU, SA, developers, BA as required
- create SOW
[edit] Est
- purpose: Exact estimation
- owner: Developer/ Dev Manager
- ph mantis field: Est
Details:
- conduct L1 estimation (replace L0 with L1)
[edit] DQ2 details
- purpose: Implementation
- owner: Perry
- ph mantis field: Dev/QA/SIT/UAT/T2S/Rel
Details:
- conduct weekly DQ meetings to:
- a) review previous week's progress
- b) create plans for next week
- review previous week's progress (post mortem):
- sort by due=wYY
- go task by task and see status/ph it is in (most must pass QA and be in SIT/UAT)
- send weekly review (post mortem) to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den). Highlight in RED overdue tasks/developers that have overdue tasks.
- create plans for next week:
- identify how many m/h available from each dev next week (Normally, each dev would contribute 8 hours a week to DQ2. 4 hours if super busy with the Proj )
- sort tasks in DQ by T and create plan for each dev:
- assign mantis to dev
- set due mantis field to wXX where XX is week number
- send weekly plan to all managers (Marc, KU, Ale, Den)
- coordinate SIT/UAT and Release phases of DQ2