Acc reporting for groupped shipments
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Solution ver 1) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| - | == | + | == SOW 1 == |
| + | |||
| + | fgjhfg | ||
| + | |||
| + | fgj | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Search Inv Rep === | ||
| + | |||
| + | xfgv | ||
| + | |||
| + | gh | ||
| + | fgjh | ||
| + | f | ||
| + | |||
| + | === P/L for mult CTs Rep === | ||
| + | |||
| + | dfbdb | ||
| + | |||
| + | dgb | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
=== 0003227: (Acc Etc) Cost allocation redesign (cost assignment to CT that is a part of a group, etc) === | === 0003227: (Acc Etc) Cost allocation redesign (cost assignment to CT that is a part of a group, etc) === | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 7 December 2011
Contents |
Info
0003227: (Acc Etc) Cost allocation redesign (cost assignment to CT that is a part of a group, etc)
Requirements
Problem definition
- By design there is no concept of P/L(Gross Margin) amount for individual CT. This is only true in case CT is a part of a group. Assumption was that in this case it would be enough to define P/L amount for a group (that this CT belongs to). OD
SOW 1
fgjhfg
fgj
Search Inv Rep
xfgv
gh fgjh f
P/L for mult CTs Rep
dfbdb
dgb
