1763 rfsa
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Requirements) |
(→Requirements) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Add Extra Fields to the client applications where is report & main report as both a filter & output. | * Add Extra Fields to the client applications where is report & main report as both a filter & output. | ||
| - | * | + | * Filter should display the '''name''' of the Extra Field as set in the client company. |
| - | '''See | + | |
| + | '''See Elizabeth Arden example below:''' | ||
[[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | [[File:1763 MU.JPG]] | ||
* Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company. | * Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company. | ||
| - | ** | + | ** Note, Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. It is also listed on their [[Daily_Report_-_Elizabeth_Arden]] where the names already displays under the column header of ''Division'' & ''Lot''. |
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 21:37, 17 January 2011
Info
- mantis: 1763
Requirements
This request is to add both a filtering option for clients who have "Extra field(s)" set in their Admin >> Client Company's profile under section E. Commodity Table Management as well as an output option.
- Add Extra Fields to the client applications where is report & main report as both a filter & output.
- Filter should display the name of the Extra Field as set in the client company.
See Elizabeth Arden example below:
- Name on Output should be the same name as set in the client company.
- Note, Right now, client company Elizabeth Arden has both Extra field 1 & Extra field 2 checked to display on their commodity table. It is also listed on their Daily_Report_-_Elizabeth_Arden where the names already displays under the column header of Division & Lot.
