White and black box design
From UG
(Difference between revisions)
(→Black box design) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Lets introduce Two types of Design methodology. | Lets introduce Two types of Design methodology. | ||
| - | + | == White box design == | |
What we follow now in most cases: | What we follow now in most cases: | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* QA tests based on Design doc | * QA tests based on Design doc | ||
| - | + | == Black box design== | |
Alternative approach: | Alternative approach: | ||
* Requirements doc completed | * Requirements doc completed | ||
| - | * Developer codes based on Requirements doc (creating | + | * Developer codes based on Requirements doc (creating Fully Functional Prototype) |
* Sys analyst creates and documents Design based on Prototype | * Sys analyst creates and documents Design based on Prototype | ||
* Design and Prototype go through review process | * Design and Prototype go through review process | ||
* QA tests based on Design doc | * QA tests based on Design doc | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Test == | ||
Current revision as of 16:29, 3 December 2010
Contents |
[edit] Intro
Lets introduce Two types of Design methodology.
[edit] White box design
What we follow now in most cases:
- Requirements doc completed
- Sys analyst creates and documents Design based on Requirements doc
- Design goes through review process
- developer codes based on Design doc
- QA tests based on Design doc
[edit] Black box design
Alternative approach:
- Requirements doc completed
- Developer codes based on Requirements doc (creating Fully Functional Prototype)
- Sys analyst creates and documents Design based on Prototype
- Design and Prototype go through review process
- QA tests based on Design doc
